Monday, August 24, 2009

'Palin's Deceptions' and a
Trig-Truther's Anonymity

The anti-Palin blog "Palin's Deceptions" proudly proclaims itself "The Web site that started it all" -- a link to the original site, "Sarah Palin's Lies," of which the blog is part -- and "all" in this case is that notorious fever swamp of obstetric speculation known as Trig Trutherism.

Palin's Deceptions blogger "Audrey," in her first post dated Sept. 15, 2008, began a discussion of the bizarre Trig-Truther theory this way:
"In my labor coaching and childbirth experience . . ."
So, from Day One, "Audrey" offered her professional expertise in support of this speculation that Trig was not actually Sarah Palin's child. And it was not merely her own expertise that she cited:
As has been stated so many other places, it is incomprehensible that a doctor would not have told Gov. Palin to go to a hospital immediately and get checked out. . . . (Or, as my physician husband has quipped: "I must have missed that day in medical school.") (Emphasis added.)
Now, I wish to raise a question in blog ethics: When an anonymous blogger claims a special expertise in a field, so as to support a particular line of personal attack on a public figure, has that blogger thereby made her own real-life identity a matter relevant to the discussion?

This is not strictly a hypothetical question. IYKWIMAITYD.

Given that there is an actual answer involved -- that "Audrey" is in fact a flesh-and-blood human being whose identity can be discovered -- what I'm wondering is how best to share that answer.

Would readers prefer that I adopt the favorite mode of Trig-Truthers? "Just asking questions," as they say.

Please feel free to comment. I've got 28 browser windows open, and must start compiling the next post before I crash my laptop. Guess who else may be interested?

UPDATE 4 p.m.: "Who is 'AnnieB393'?" Remember, "Just asking questions."

24 comments:

  1. She merits being outed. By any means necessary.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm a firm believer in rarely outing an anonymous blogger, I'm more a believer in just proving them wrong. I think that blogger's information is flat-out wrong - a woman who has had four kids is going to be much more of an expert on how her own body handles pregnancy, labor, and delivery than some random schmuck who's theorizing on it.

    The theories in the comments over there are hilarious in hindsight.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The polite method would be to send an e-mail or post requesting confirmation with a promise of confidentiality so it can be verified.

    If it turns out that the information is not true, then frankly all bets are off, one has no right to privacy to spread falsehoods. If the information is true then I'd respect the privacy from one person to another.

    Frankly there are no secrets on the web.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If you offer any information to boost credibility of an "argument", it should be verifiable. If I were a betting woman, I would wager that the husband missed more than a day of medical school. I am not a betting woman however, since I am the fabulously wealthy and er beautiful ummmm Morgan Fairchild. That's the ticket, I will out myself before you and Riehl get the chance.

    Morgan votes for the slow and painful revelation.

    ReplyDelete
  5. And the fact that a person who has never had any part of his body encounter the inside of a woman's body (namely, Sullivan) would attach himself so vigorously to a woman claiming to know so much about the Palin family is humorous.

    ReplyDelete
  6. out her Jesse Griffin style!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I just linked your post in my post from this morning predicting that Obama's minions would be telling some big lie about Gov. Palin, or attributing a big lie to her, to shift media attention from Obama's Rasmussen poll number hitting a record low yesterday of -14.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Not a big fan of outing, but i make a big exception. When the anon. source or writer claims personal expertise, and then lies. You have to expose them in order to show their dishonesty.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Mr. McCain, fyi - this trig truther is also on twitter @palinsdeception. she has yet to mention your statement or that of dan's.

    x11b1p(on twitter)

    ReplyDelete
  10. I second Dave C. and Anon @ 3:54:

    Out the bitch Jesse Griffin style

    anginak

    ReplyDelete
  11. Left wing pussies "just ask questions". Right wing studs say "this is what I know, this is what I suspect, this is what I believe, here's why."

    Don't be a pussy. :-)

    Someone who wants to be anonymous (like me) should never give an "argument from authority." So she's pushing the line even if she isn't lying. If she is, she deserves to be outed.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Do it, do it, do it, do it, do it, do it....

    Etc, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Kinda funny coming from Anon..

    ReplyDelete
  15. Dave, if you ever start posting cockamamie crackpot theories, remind me to "out" you -- anonymously.

    WTF are these people thinking, anyway?

    ReplyDelete
  16. I think that David Corley Riddle loves to see other people outed, but is pretty afraid to see his own name out there. Good to know. Thanks, Robert!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Please, please, please rip this bitch in half. She and the rest of the Trig Troofers deserve nothing less.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Out her! Betcha her boobs sag, too...

    ReplyDelete
  19. never tried to hide it..

    BTW..

    Dave, if you ever start posting cockamamie crackpot theories, remind me to "out" you -- anonymously.

    The Detroit Lions are going to the Super Bowl!!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Out her. Over and over again. Do it. Do it now.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Linked to at:
    http://www.thecampofthesaints.com/2009.08.23_arch.html#1251158122862

    ReplyDelete
  22. You should out this girl, too:
    http://tinyurl.com/shocked-doc

    ReplyDelete