Sunday, January 18, 2009

Cracker-Americans for Steyn

Whatever idiot sent that stupid e-mail to Mark Steyn, he doesn't speak for the entirety of "cracker Appalachia," and he certainly doesn't speak for me.

When a man suffers what Steyn suffered for political incorrectness, he is my ally. And when you consider that what Steyn is saying about demographics, immigration and culture is, to a great degree, the same thing that Pat Buchanan has been saying about demographics, immigration and culture -- well, you see the basis for a new fusionism, an opportunity to heal the bitter breach between paleoconservatives and neoconservatives that goes back to Mel Bradford.

Why do I feel like I'm the only one who sees these things? Peter Brimelow includes Michelle Malkin on his VDare blogroll. Phyllis Chesler favorably cites The Camp of the Saints. In Godless, Ann Coulter paid tribute to Joe Sobran (!) as a mentor. Could the basis of a tactical ceasefire be any more apparent? If we view the embarrassing defeat of Crazy Cousin John as the final debacle of the GOP's open-borders wing, is it not possible that, at a very minimum, conservatives in the circular firing squad could agree to form a semi-circle for the next four years?

As I said this morning in reference to Ron Paul, with Obama in the White House and Democrats in control of Congress, "Republican foreign policy" is now a moot debate. Can we call an intermission in the Sharks-vs.-Jets quarrel over imperialism? Conservatism is at coffin corner, and one good thing about having your back against the wall is, it makes it much harder for your "friends" to backstab you.

If we cannot unite on a few basic issues, Team Obama will run the table so completely, there will be nothing left worth fighting over. I attended a roundtable last week during which one conservative suggested that, with 41 Republican senators, a filibuster is possible. I couldn't restrain myself: "Susan Collins? Are you kidding me?"

Conservatives who imagine that the current crisis allows leisure for internal feuding over ancient grievances and philosophical disputes are woefully underestimating the severity of the crisis. Folks, if Obama gets nationalized health care, that's it: Game over. Hello, Permanent Welfare State, a la Scandinavia.

As my remark about Susan Collins was meant to suggest, our only hope of stopping such a measure is to bring unbearable heat on enough red-state Democratic senators to force them to join in a filibuster with the 30-something Republicans who can be counted on for the cloture vote. If a national health-care plan passes cloture, even some of those 30-odd GOP stalwarts will peel off, the plan will pass with 70-plus votes and -- if history is any guide -- it can never be repealed.

Seems to me some of my fellow Cracker-Americans are living in a dreamland, spoiled by a quarter-century of Republican ascendance, imagining they can be finicky in their choice of allies in the battles to come. The Hell No Coalition -- "Hell, no" to the stimulus, "Hell, no" to open borders, "Hell, no" to national health-care -- can ill afford such self-destructive infighting. In this hour of great peril, start fighting the common foe, or forfeit any right to call yourself a friend of conservatism.

UPDATE: Banner linked at Steyn Online.

15 comments:

  1. Stacy:
    You are quite correct and to make matters more dire, at least to me, it seems that the NRA is not going to oppose Eric Holder. The word is that they are trying to barter for other political issues with democrats. WTF? Right now we have to circle the wagons and instead we are turning around and grabbing our ankles. Obama must be quite amused and happy about this situation. I think we have underestimated this Hyde Park cacasotto.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Game not over with Nationalized Health Care. Sure, game over for those Northeastern States, Rustbelt and California who stay with what's left of the "United States."

    But for Texas, and all the others who follow us out of Obama's Socialist State, it's Game just beginning.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Eric:
    I think nationalised healthcare would pretty much spell the end of it. You can't take it back once you give it away. After that, it'll be free college, take away gun rights, and mandatory public service. TJ will be both powering Virginia and drilling for China.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If it's any comfort, Celente predicts a dim future for big-government, high tax types, and that future is nigh.

    It sounds like libertarian populism is going to become very popular.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Never underestimate people's willingness to be bribed with their own money.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Eric Dondero, I'm interested in the States rights road to liberty.

    Heck, we've already got a Constitution written. All we need to do is follow it.

    I would love to watch the libtards self-suffocate themselves.

    Let's roll.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well, sounds like Cons are finally waking up to the biggest con of all: The Republican/Conservative coalition.
    You see, the Republicans have been using Conservatives because they're susceptible to the red-meat politics that Cons go for.
    Gun rights? There is no principled position for gun rights. If it weren't a billion dollar industry and a special interest darling for the Republicans you would be kissing your tec-9 goodbye.
    Whatever infighting or ' philosophical grievance" there is in the party right now is nothing but the struggle between adaptation or irrelevance.
    Republicans are realizing that legislating cultural attitudes is a dead end...

    ReplyDelete
  8. "with 41 Republican senators, a filibuster is possible. I couldn't restrain myself: 'Susan Collins? Are you kidding me?'"

    "John McCain? Are you kidding me?"

    see.. both work :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. You see, the Republicans have been using Conservatives because they're susceptible to the red-meat politics that Cons go for.

    Really, I don't know what any of us would do without Y4-E's perspicacious insights on the GOP.

    Of course, the Democrat party, whose principled leaders dwell in the ether and are above reproach, have no such "red meat" issues they drag out every election to throw to their blood-thirsty base.

    Gun rights? There is no principled position for gun rights.

    Aside from that whole "Constitution" thingy.

    Go back to the KozKidz playpen and let the grown-ups talk without having to listen to your imbecilic static, you blindly partisan dupe.

    Never underestimate people's willingness to be bribed with their own money.

    That's the thing, RG. Our ruling class is going to nickel-and-dime the people to the point where they won't have a square to spare!

    Combine that with hyperinflation, and the continued bailing-out of their politically-favored corporate whores, and they are setting themselves up for some serious backlash.

    It's like Celente said, "Government and Wall Street are hand-in-glove" and the people are going to get wise to it.

    Don't infect the quantum field with such negativity, man!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Oh Rae, you need to zip it with the psycho-babble
    and get to the point, which can probably be found at the top of your head...
    It's sad to to see that the so-called grown-ups are so clueless as to shoot down an argument on my part only to validate it later in their post: "Government and Wall Street are hand-in-glove" and the people are going to get wise to it."
    I wasn't trying to make a partisan point. If you could only get your head out of your arse you might train yourself to eliminate your knee-jerk reactions to the truth.I won't hold my breath....

    ReplyDelete
  11. There is no principled position for gun rights.

    Obviously a public/marxist school kool-aid drinker.

    If you study the Founders you will find out that the 2nd Amendment was specifically put in place in order for the citizens to fight a tyrannical government.

    I would think a lefty would be all for this, what with the black-helicopter theories and BooshChimpHitler/Haliburton conspiracies.

    Look at the nations with no 2nd Amendment: d-e-a-d.

    There's a reason Barry Soetoro wants the guns taken from the citizens, it will make his marxist tyranny installation easier.

    I have never owned a firearm but I will be taking a concealed-carry class next month.

    A lyin' media, marxist O'Barry, and a tyrannical Democratic Party consisting of socialist freaks like Pelosi, Reid, Murtha, Dodd, Bwawney Frank, Dhimm Dweebb, et al. had convinced me that it's time to arm up for American Revolution II.

    It'll be better than the first...let's roll!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Oh Rae, you need to zip it...

    Mornin', Y4-E!

    I've said it before and I'll say it again, Stacy. Your blog deserves a better class of troll.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Ex-D:
    Maybe I wasn't clear enough.
    For Republicans, there is no principled Gun Rights stance. It is simply a cashcow industry they can exploit. Clearly there is a principled stance on gun rights from Conservatives, as flawed as the principle is...
    But you have bigger problems than fire-arms, my friend.Before you build that bunker behind your residence you should give therapy a try. I hear the delirium coming from your side and while funny, it ain't pretty. Besides being a boon for gun manufacturers, you nut jobs will do well for the therapy industry. Why don't you go and finger-paint your silly second American Revolution before you actually take up arms. Perhaps wait for Obama to take office before yelling "fire"?
    Paranoia...self-destroy-a.
    And how....

    ReplyDelete
  14. 4-eyes:
    The truth is we have a right to bear arms. May be in your world that doesn't exist or is not legitimate, but it is in mine. When you actually contribute to society in paying taxes, raising kids and being responsible, then, and only then will your words mean a damn thing.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Right Guy,
    I do pay taxes. And none of that payroll stuff where you go to H&R Block and get a nice return around tax time.Which makes it pretty challenging to raise a teenager these days. Young dad, what can I say...

    I guess we are all informed by experience. I grew up in an area devastated by the drug epidemic of the 80's, or what some wistfully call the Reagan era.
    My owning a fire-arm would not have prevented people that I knew from getting murdered.
    I find it difficult to reconcile the unregulated sales of weapons to anyone and everyone with what the founders had in mind.
    I don't like the idea of constitutional amendments, but I do recall that once upon a time African Americans were considered only two-thirds of a person. Certainly there is room for some reasonable compromise...

    ReplyDelete