If you misrepresent what's in the plan, we will call you out.--BHO
Now, contrast this with the Fourth President, James Madison, who had written in Federalist #62 (Federalism, Mr. Obama: do you speak it?), emphasis mine:
It will be of little avail to the people,I can't really decide which misrepresentation of what's in the plan I prefer. Shall we go sweep left?will not be in place until 2013, a pass right might make more sense:
that the laws are made by men of their own choice,
if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read,
or so incoherent that they cannot be understood;
if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated,
or undergo such incessant changes that no man,
who knows what the law is to-day,
can guess what it will be to-morrow.
Law is defined to be a rule of action;
but how can that be a rule,
which is little known,
and less fixed?
- Dan Riehl has a stream of conscious tweets.
- Director Blue demolishes four lies.
- Confederate Yankee was wildly unimpressed.
- Don Surber is pessimistic.
- Cato cleans copious clock with a time-stamped, multi-expert gadget that is well worth review.
However, the perpetrators of the disappointment shall have long since departed the pattern by the time the true nature of the suck is apparent.
Legal Insurrection points out an accusation of prevarication yelled in the POTUS direction.
Fix Director Blue link. Thanks for the boot to the head, Dan.