Posts
Make no mistake, the accusation of raaaaacism is intended to undermine Michelle's credibility. Michelle did a post about schoolchildren being brainwashed to
Now I'd bet Michelle would say, "Aww, that's so cute!" Why? Because the kids are white and its George Bush? Yeah, right. And so there's the racial problem -- she can ignore singing if its done by white school kids praising a white Republican President, but if the subject's America's first black President, she gets really mad.No, @$$hole, what gets Michelle and a lot of other people mad is that the allegedly superior minds in the MSM are so blind to their own biases. The media's worshipful attitude toward Obama -- as Jesse Jackson might say, "If the president's black, you can't attack" -- is a perfect example of a phenomenon that a conservative friend pointed out to me years ago.
Most Americans get along just fine and dandy with people of other races in their everyday real lives. What makes them angry is the way the media portray race relations. The endless reiteration of preachy liberal messages send a clear signal from the MSM elite: "You're so stupid, we must remind you constantly that prejudice is a bad thing."
This elitist condescension is insulting, but if you complain about it, that only proves what a bigot you are. It's a Catch-22, see? So if Michelle Malkin has the courage to speak out -- her latest column is about the New Jersey school indoctrination -- this makes her the target of vicious attacks. Not only is she not going along with the progressive agenda, but she relentlessly exposes the manipulations of the MSM propaganda.
Are complaints about MSM bias all about politics? Republicans just "working the refs"? No. Because so much of what people know (or think they know) about the world comes via media, the lopsided liberal bias has the effect of cluttering people's minds with false impressions.
- Don't worry about radical Islam, the MSM say, the real danger is those "anti-government" Tea Party rallies.
- Don't worry about the exploding federal deficit, the MSM say, the real danger is those racists who didn't vote for Obama.
- Don't worry about the mistakes in our bogus reporting, the MSM say, the real danger is Glenn Beck.
Michelle Malkin is a "white supremacist"? Make. Me. Laugh.
UPDATE: Thanks to the anonymous commenter for this screencap of LGF's Charles Johnson attacking Michelle Malkin this week with a Huffington Post "white supremacist" smear:
The sick part of it is that the slimeball has more or less confessed that his leftward turn is all about the money. And now the downfall of Mad King Charles continues with a ROTLMAO video.
Here's Johnson smearing Michele Malkin.
ReplyDeletehttp://img225.imageshack.us/img225/1156/johnsonmichelemalkinhuf.jpg
Now I'd bet Michelle would say, "Aww, that's so cute!" Why? Because the kids are white and its George Bush? Yeah, right. And so there's the racial problem -- she can ignore singing if its done by white school kids praising a white Republican President, but if the subject's America's first black President, she gets really mad.
ReplyDeleteThat line made me laugh and cry. Note that the commentator doesn't actually know what Malkin would say or how she'd react and has NO facts on how she would react. He/she just makes up an imaginary reaction and then proceeds to condemn her based solely upon his/her fevered dreams.
Remember kids! It's not what you actually say and do, it's what they THINK you say and do.
Hitting the MSM about their bias is not working the refs. It's making sure they don't jack up one end of the court. We are the refs that decide the game between the political parties not the MSM.
ReplyDeleteIf I hear one more moonbat compare the Obama Deification and Sing-a-long that took place in New Jersey with Jesus Camp, I believe my brain will explode. Jesus Camp was a PRIVATE camp, paid for by the parents who wished their children to attend. Parents knew what their children would be doing and learning--if they didn't approve of it, they didn't have to send their child to the camp. The school in New Jersey is a PUBLIC elementary school, paid for with tax dollars. Parents had no idea what their children were being taught and were not given a chance to opt-out of the program.
ReplyDeleteMy mother taught in elementary schools for over 20 years and never once did partisan politics enter her classroom or the classrooms of her fellow teachers, except to explain to the children how the election process worked. This doesn't have a damned thing to do with raaaaacism--this is about what's right and proper to teach in a classroom. Deifying Obama to the tune of "Jesus Loves the Little Children" isn't it.
What's odd about this is that the disgusting display in Burlington is clearly prohibited by West Virginia School Board v. Barnette 319 U.S. 624 (1943). It's a case the left often cites for their own purposes. But, when it comes to Ozero idolatry, not so much. The Court's 6-3 decision:
ReplyDelete"If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. If there are any circumstances which permit an exception, they do not now occur to us.
We think the action of the local authorities in compelling the flag salute and pledge transcends constitutional limitations on their power and invades the sphere of intellect and spirit which it is the purpose of the First Amendment to our Constitution to reserve from all official control."
That seems rather clear.