Is it paranoid/crazy to think that he has been (literally) bought by one of the Sugar Daddies on the left? Or is he just establishing his ideological bona fides after switching sides? I know that you have a tough skin, but it couldn't have felt good to have Charles attack you like that. At least now, it's obvious that he is not rational.Correct, it did not feel good to be attacked, ma'am, but pray that God always sends me only cowardly fools for enemies, as I thank God for sending such brave and wise friends like you, Lydia.
Many have speculated on the motives for the sudden Madness of King Charles, but as I noted earlier today, it wasn't really sudden. I had always been under the impression that CJ was independently wealthy, which would make the "Sugar Daddies on the Left" speculation moot. But . . . Sugar Bears? NTTAWWT.
And as for the obviousness of CJ's irrationality . . . well, he attacked me without cause, didn't he?
Chlanna nan con thigibh a so’s gheibh sibh feoil!
UPDATE 12:20 p.m. ET: Via 2.0 Blogmocracy, HadEnough at Comment #20, "Ruh-roh":
370 Killgore TroutAnd when the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. I saw where this was heading last week and sent an e-mail warning Michelle that Mad King Charles would eventually follow through on his April threat to her. If this is indeed a new add to The Boss's blog roll -- LGF'ers love to make stuff up -- then we can only assume she's daring him to try it.
Sun, Sep 20, 2009 8:02:56am
Charles noticed last night that Malkin has added VDARE to her blog roll. Things are gonna get weird.
Be ready for Bloggageddon. The revolution will not be televised, but the apocalypse will be blogged.