McCain is a violent, right-wing extremist nutjob… an unhinged serial bully who uses threats and thuggery to intimidate, harass and silence anyone who criticizes him. Unfortunately, he has a lot of company in the right-wing blogosphere… and a shameful amount of support from diseased right-wing conservative websites like Hot Air that should be soundly criticized and shunned for allowing their sites to become vehicles for thuggery, hate speech, racism and bigotry.Violent, ma'am? Diseased, ma'am? Criticized and shunned? There are those who claim to have definitely identified your LGF colleague "Madaura." And now conservative lesbian Cynthia Yockey asks, "Is Kejda Gjermani working as a concern troll to support Islamic jihad?"
Just askin' questions, you see . . .
Ex-Lizard Da Tech Guy is reporting the blow-by-blow ("Johnson gets the round 10-9 Current Score 58-55 McCain after 6") but is neither the judge nor the referee. A bloodied pugilist stands at mid-ring, bows his head to pray, and awaits the bell in silence.
"Even a fool, when he holdeth his peace, is counted wise: and he that shutteth his lips is esteemed a man of understanding."Thank God, and please keep me in your prayers.
-- Proverbs 17:28
Hmm..You know a couple of weeks ago Madaura joyously announced to the lizard crowd that she and her husband were taking an inexpensive and therefore groovy type vacation in Albania. Showed us some pics of where she was staying and everyone wished her Bon Voyage. Hmm..2+2 do =4 in this case.
ReplyDeleteRe Irish Rose:. I swear that does not seem like the same little unemployed sad sack that previously posted at LGF. Something just ain't right over there. Something bigger than just a change of attitude on CJ's part. I have to tell you I'm just plain tired of trying to figure it out.
Wild Irish Rose seems like she is hitting the Jameson pretty darn hard, and mixing in some psilocybin mushrooms and meth to boot.
ReplyDeleteThat is just wild speculation on my part, but not as wild as her prose!
Wild Irish Rose, as I best I understand it, is saying "You're such a dirty birdy."
ReplyDeleteDon't jostle the little figurines on the hall table, McCain - if you do, you're done for.
Wm T Sherman
Chuckles, WhiskyRose, Sharmuted, and a few others are all Charles F Johnson. He has a split personality all of which are whack.
ReplyDeleteDid you know that 50 percent of all "female" political bloggers are really Gay men. NTTAWWT
ReplyDeleteApparently we are all racists, even Glenn Reynolds:
ReplyDeletepeterb says:
September 23, 2009 at 8:52 pm
Whether or not the statement that considering interracial couples causes an “altogether natural revulsion” is racist is not a matter of opinion. That statement is practically a definition of racism.
This is not about whether Johnson is good, bad, or a space alien from the planet Mergatroid. This is about Robert Stacy McCain being a dog, and the people laying down with him waking up with fleas. I don’t know who Instapundit is, but if he’s hanging out with white supremacists and quoting them for truth, then yes, he’s a racist too. You can’t sleep with a syphilitic whore and then claim then pretend to be virgin.
peterb´s last blog ..Next Next Gen
God these LGF nutcases make you want to puke. That idiot Kedja said I was a racist too--because I have not denouced R.S. McCain for his white supremacist racism. Since I have emailed John Podhoretz (you know friendly stuff back and forth) does that make him a racist too? Heck there are like six degrees of racism for every living person on the planet.
Jeez Louise, so I better just run with it. Which interracial couple caused you revulsion?
I would say, none of the above, but to be contrary I am going to go with Roger Ebert, but only because he also engaged in an apparent transgender operation to turn himself into a middle aged fat lesbian woman (sorry Cynthia but I suspect the mere thought of this would offend you more than it does me).
Of course we can go old school on this topic too.
Coolest old school interracial couple, hands down, Kim Novak and Sammy Davis Junior.
Most boring old school interracial couple: Tom and Helen Willis on the Jeffersons.
But the one mixed marriage I never got was this one. If my sister did something this dumb, it would fill me with revulsion.
Robert,
ReplyDeleteThe intensity of this hatred toward you is nothing new. Pat Buchanan saw the same phenomenon six years ago, and puzzled over it in an article appropriately entitled Why Do They Hate Dixie? Buchanan bristled at Charles Krauthammer for dismissing Southerners as "rebel-yelling racist rednecks" while gladly accepting their support for the wars he cheered on. Southerners have a proud tradition of military service, and yet it is service to a nation that despises us.
When we're useful to them, they'll accept our sacrifices, but when we stand up for what's important to us, from defending the real meaning of the Battleflag, to opposing amnesty for illegal aliens, then we're denounced as unworthy of their enlightened presence.
Fooling us into working for their agenda though they hate us is part of the "noble lie" that Neocons believe is necessary for the guidance of the great unwashed. No wonder someone like Charles Johnson admires Irving Kristol.
BTW, you should ask Gjermani if she's seen Liam Neeson's "Taken." It's very instructive about Albanian culture.
Don't you just love it when the method they use to call you a bully and a hateful right winger is a post full of hate ? If anyone sounds unhinged its Wild Irish Rose.
ReplyDeleteOld Rebel:
ReplyDeleteWhile I do not discount what Pat Buchanan said about Southerners and Southern pride, I do discount his apologies for Adolph Hitler. While I do not accept Charles Johnson calling everyone a racist, I also reject people who make apolgies for Hitler. Be they Joe Kennedy Sr. or Pat Buchanan.
Irving Kristol was an old radical who turned conservative. I care more about where a guy ends up than where he starts out. A guy who said these things is okay in my book:
"Democracy does not guarantee equality of conditions -- it only guarantees equality of opportunity."
and
"The liberal paradigm of regulation and license has led to a society where an 18-year-old girl has the right to public fornication in a pornographic movie -- but only if she is paid the minimum wage."
Do I accept every premise of neoconservatism? Hardly. But I also remember Reagan's argument that an 80% friend is better than an enemy and don't let perfect be the enemy of good.
"McCain is a violent, right-wing extremist nutjob… an unhinged serial bully who uses threats and thuggery to intimidate, harass and silence anyone who criticizes him."
ReplyDeleteI would think that this sort of crapola is legally actionable. Unless you have a history of braking peoples legs for disagreeing with you. She's describing you as being "violent" and a person who uses "threats .. to silence anyone who criticizes" you. That goes well beyond mere internet name-callng and into libel and defamation. You either engage in this activity, criminal activity, or you don't. It's not a grey area.
"Whether or not the statement that considering interracial couples causes an “altogether natural revulsion” is racist is not a matter of opinion."
ReplyDeleteSince the dictionary definition of racist is
"a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others"
then it rather plainly IS a matter of opinon what the word "racist" means. Hell, these days I'm being told it s "racist" to oppose the Democrats health-care plans! There seem to be a million-and-one opinions out there about what the word means.
"While I do not discount what Pat Buchanan said about Southerners and Southern pride, I do discount his apologies for Adolph Hitler."
ReplyDeleteYou know, I don't recall Pat Buchanan ever making apologies for Adolph Hitler. I don't know where this particular piece of nonsense got started. Maybe with the same people currntly accusing most of the right of being Nazis.
It is "Adolf" not "Adolph" Hitler. Read Buchanan's book "The Unnecessary War" for all the Nazi apologias you can handle.
ReplyDeleteYou know, I don't recall Pat Buchanan ever making apologies for Adolph Hitler. I don't know where this particular piece of nonsense got started.
ReplyDeleteHow about this?
Some of what he says (in regards to the actions of the Western Europeans) is true, because undoubtably the end of WWI and the Treaty of Versailles was a primary cause for the instability that led to Hitler, the Third Reich, and WWW II; but why Buchanan wants to portray Hitler as some misunderstood leader who was goaded into World War II is beyond me (sorry, that is a leap I am not prepared to make). Some regimes are just flat out evil. The Soviet System (especially under Stalin) and the National Socialist Party both fall into that catagory. There is a reason most conservatives discount Pat Buchanan and it is not because he is liabled and slandered by the left.
Joe wrote, "Irving Kristol was an old radical who turned conservative. I care more about where a guy ends up than where he starts out."
ReplyDeleteIf Irving Kristol is a conservative, then I guess Rasputin was a Christian. After all, he claimed to be one, didn't he?
Conservatism was defined by Burke and de Maistre. It arose in reaction to the French Revolution, which sought to impose Enlightenment ideals onto society to create what was suppoed to be a better world. Instead, the Jacobins created rivers of blood (just as their intellectual heirs, the Communists of the Soviet Union, China, and Cambodia would do later). If you're going to make an omelet, you have to break some eggs, you see.
Conservatives reject ideologies and social reengineering, as well as the rationalism that justifies both because man is a complex being with a created soul, not a blank slate that coffehouse philosophers can reconstruct into a demigod. Our loyalties are to historical, organic societies rather than to abstract notions.
So what's a Neocon? It's a Jacobin who's stolen the language of conservatism to impose a radical agenda. While conservatives believe in a God-directed social order that arises out of generations of tradition and wisdom, radicals believe in "creative destruction" (a favorite Neocon worship-word). So we want the power of government narrowly restricted to certain powers, with most of human activity to be guided by tradition, faith, family obligations, and other freely chosen, spontaneous associations.
Neocons, like other leftists, want an all-powerful government that can reconstruct the world, which includes home and abroad. So the Neocon surveillance state, its Open Borders agenda, and continuous war and revolution to destroy traditional order, are the opposite of true conservatism.