Tuesday, April 21, 2009

'Party of the rich'?

"Republicans get angry that they are always seen as the party of the rich. I don't believe that. They are not the party of the rich. They are also not the party of the poor. Both parties ignore the poor, and both are headed and ruled by elitists. The general public gets that and that is why most people don't vote and the ones who do are more inclined to identify as independents."

1 comment:

  1. I think that "party of the rich" is built upon significant, tacit materialism. Boo.