There is no way that in the US we would roundup every illegal immigrant -there are about 12 million of the illegal immigrants- not only economically is that just an impossibility but that’s not a humane way anyway to deal with the issue that we face with illegal immigration.Gov. Palin, you have been deceived by the pro-amnesty crowd, who love to present this issue as a false dilemma, where we must choose between (a) amnesty for illegals or (b) a massive round-up of millions of illegals. This ignores the alternative favored by most opponents of amnesty, namely the attrition or "self-deportation" approach:
- Enhance border security, to slow the influx of illegals.
- Step up "interior enforcement," especially targeting major employers of illegal labor.
- Authorize state and local officials to identify and detain illegals (which would result in greatly enhanced interior enforcement).
- Disqualify illegals for public benefits.
Once a net outflow developed -- more illegals self-deporting than arriving annually, so that the illegal population was steadily decreasing -- two major benefits would become apparent. First, there would be decreased political pressure for amnesty. Second, voters would no longer feel that their communities were being overrun by an invasion.
If government at all levels could work toward this attrition strategy for a few years, it would alleviate the crisis mentality that has developed over the past 15 years. As long as our borders are so evidently out of control, with hundreds of thousands of new illegals arriving every year, citizens will rightly demand a crackdown, and it will be politically impossible to enact any kind of comprehensive overhaul of the system.
Even those who favor a "path to citizenship" for illegals (which I do not) must understand that voters will not support such a measure so long as the illegal population continues to increase daily. Those who dismiss voter concerns by talking about the impossibility of mass deportations are missing the point entirely.
Robert, I don't think she's been deceived. Alaska is a sanctuary state, and there's no record of her taking a stand against that policy.
ReplyDeleteShe loves Bigger Government, anyway. Today, in Penn she promised to increase FedGov's Education budget.
http://articles.lancasteronline.com/ap/4/pa_palin_special_needs
Izzy Lyman