House Republicans led the way and will get most of the blame. It has been interesting to watch them on their single-minded mission to destroy the Republican Party. Not long ago, they led an anti-immigration crusade that drove away Hispanic support. Then, too, they listened to the loudest and angriest voices in their party, oblivious to the complicated anxieties that lurk in most American minds.Brooks has a problem, but it's not with House Republicans. It's Republican voters Brooks hates. It was Republican voters -- not the gutless weasels in Congress -- who drove the opposition to this bailout.
(Insert vituperative ad hominem rant here. Add colorful threats of physical brutality, suggestions of anatomically impossible acts, etc. Quote Cicero's first oration against Catiline, Jesus' condemnation of the Pharisees, Forrest's denunciation of Bragg, etc.)
There, I feel better now.
UPDATE: James Poulos dismantles Brooks with valid logic and temperate language, as behooves a Greek philosopher. My Scots-Irish blood prefers the more direct approach: "You have played the part of a damned scoundrel, and are a coward, and if you were any part of a man, I would slap your jaws and force you to resent it. . . . If you ever again try to interfere with me or cross my path, it will be at the peril of your life." Such straightforward rhetoric, alas, is unfashionable in contemporary discourse.
>Then, too, they listened to the loudest and angriest voices in their party
ReplyDeleteAs opposed to the preferred voices of the fat-cat lobbyists, apparently.
Heaven forbid that the will of the people be done.
David Brooks- Worst columnist ever!
ReplyDelete