"A new Obama-Biden ad includes misleading claims about McCain and education spending," says FactCheck.org. "The Obama ad says that McCain 'voted to cut education funding' and lists five Senate votes. But only one of the five meets that description, and even then, the vote requires further explanation."
The accusation that McCain has a plan that would cut school funding is based on a teachers-union analysis which says that McCain's proposed freeze on domestic discretionary spending is a "cut." Is it a "cut" to freeze spending at current levels? More to the point, is the problem with public schools a shortage of money?
Here's the Obama ad:
Pay up chump! Obama billed $35,043.04 by Newport Beach, California for
extra security costs
-
Obama loves to party and fundraiser on the tax payer’s dime. Apparently he
doesn’t like paying for the extra security his presence causes. In Newport
Beach...
8 hours ago



Remind me again why the DC is funding schools?
ReplyDeleteWas it that we don't grasp Federalism?
Got it, thanks.