tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post9209876113177390963..comments2024-02-24T00:37:43.087-05:00Comments on The Other McCain: 'It's a Barnum and Bailey world, just as phony as it can be...'Robert Stacy McCainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03084541621503669804noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-77328157688635330802009-11-29T07:26:22.220-05:002009-11-29T07:26:22.220-05:00This Weisberg post is the single worst interpretat...This Weisberg post is the single worst interpretation of the past ten months I have yet to read. Not surpised to see it originated in Newsweak.dr killnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-66037069884395250012009-11-28T22:50:54.848-05:002009-11-28T22:50:54.848-05:00@SDN,
If Reagan signed those spending bills, then ...@SDN,<br />If Reagan signed those spending bills, then to say 'Reagan had NOTHING to do' is inaccurate.<br /><br />He offered the leadership. We might agree that there were good, acute reasons for doing so, as FDR had in WWII. Alas, no Truman followed Regan to walk back $1 of that additional debt.smitty1ehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06559464300318848169noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-46937367145271945802009-11-28T22:29:56.553-05:002009-11-28T22:29:56.553-05:00Smitty, you make a typical lefty mistake: Reagan h...Smitty, you make a typical lefty mistake: Reagan had NOTHING to do with expanding the deficit, since all revenue bills originate in the Congress, and unless you have 60 reliable conservative Senators, statists will force government to expand because they can shut down even the essential functions unless they are bought off. Win the Cold War, or shrink government: pick one.<br /><br />SDNAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com