tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post451859505986798434..comments2024-02-24T00:37:43.087-05:00Comments on The Other McCain: What's Wrong With the North Bronx?Robert Stacy McCainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03084541621503669804noreply@blogger.comBlogger43125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-69596595083886313352009-05-28T01:02:57.491-04:002009-05-28T01:02:57.491-04:00Dear Capt. Blovious--
Surely I'm dealing with a fu...Dear Capt. Blovious--<br />Surely I'm dealing with a future talk-show host.I can't wait to see how you take what I've said<br />and re-iterate it so that it seems like you actually said something original.<br />My gawd, no wonder you're side is still losing!<br />When Sotomayor is confirmed, I will laugh my ass off thinking of the excruciating pain you'll be dealing with, not to mention the<br />humiliation you and the rest of your trailer-bred ilk will have to live with.<br />Oh, the sad tune those banjo's play when your ideology is reduced to <br />the wishful-thinking pap it is today...<br />Deliverance is yours when you put down your Am radio...<br />Squeal!!!Young 4-Eyeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04159195318322896154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-28835002727013547672009-05-27T22:34:48.897-04:002009-05-27T22:34:48.897-04:00Dear Captain Oblivious
Flattered by the offer, bu...Dear Captain Oblivious<br /><br />Flattered by the offer, but I'm just not interested in stuffing you into my pants, no matter how much tinfoil you're wrapped in.<br /><br />Oh, and for future reference, you can't "call" anything if you don't ante anything of value. You might notice that the last screed you posted didn't actually refute anything. I know, you often forget to think up a point in the midst of your foaming lather.<br /><br />Until next time, evil-doer! Stay Safe!Captain Obviousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-13904501698097173872009-05-27T21:09:52.290-04:002009-05-27T21:09:52.290-04:00Yes, why use a cannon to kill a mosquito?
I asked ...Yes, why use a cannon to kill a mosquito?<br />I asked the same question when Bush decided to go after Saddam.<br />But I get the feeling that you think your are the one wielding the cannons here.<br />Well ol' chum, I'm still waiting. In the meantime, you might consider stuffing your pants with the proverbial aluminum wrapped pickle. You've got no cannons and it seems like your mommy has taken away what little cojones God endowed you with.<br />I'm calling your bluff,Cindy....Young 4-Eyeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04159195318322896154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-32539279433347507292009-05-27T18:33:47.564-04:002009-05-27T18:33:47.564-04:00You're so vain, you probably think this post is ab...You're so vain, you probably think this post is about you...<br /><br />Why use a cannon to kill a mosquito?<br /><br />Especially one that couldn't "prove" its way out of a tautology.Captain Obviousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-23212919429762934672009-05-27T16:47:18.831-04:002009-05-27T16:47:18.831-04:00Captain Obvious/Oblivious....
BORING!
Captain Obvi...Captain Obvious/Oblivious....<br />BORING!<br />Captain Obvious is so oblivious that he didn't realize that the "Captain Oblivious" moniker was meant for him.Unless he's attempting the tried but true Conservative tactic better known as the " I know you are but what am I " defense. Genius!<br /><br />But I can't help but notice that among his flimsy repertoire of verbal jousting techniques is the unoriginal method of taking everything you say and repeating it verbatim. Imitation is the highest form of flattery, so thank you... douche bag.<br /><br />Be that as it may, it seems that , in an effort to defend his dim witted opinions, he has proven himself a graduate of the radio talk-show institute for mentally deficient sociopaths.<br />Arch nemesis? OK captain. If you think so. Then again, I'm past the comic book stage while you still peddle simplistic euphemisms. I bet you worship Jack Baur, dontcha?<br />Til we meet again, lame-o.Young 4-Eyeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04159195318322896154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-62621278299171221672009-05-27T14:29:39.796-04:002009-05-27T14:29:39.796-04:00To Captain Oblivious (formerly known as Juvenile B...To Captain Oblivious (formerly known as Juvenile Blind Boy), my favorite arch-villain nemesis:<br /><br />You <I>blabbering half-wit inbred</I>. The idea is NOT to "characterize any 'token' appointee unqualified." The idea, you <I>stupid hick</I>, is to properly label any unqualified appointee as 'token.'<br />And 'token' does NOT infer race, as proven by the fact we don't know your race, yet we keep you around as our token <I>dip-shit troglodyte</I>.<br /><br />"Token" just means that you've proven yourself not to be taken seriously, also known as your <I>irrelevence</I>.Captain Obviousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-66388374247410589522009-05-27T04:40:58.263-04:002009-05-27T04:40:58.263-04:00Good post RSM!
Why don't we ever hear about the No...Good post RSM!<br />Why don't we ever hear about the North Bronx?<br /><br />Anyway, some thoughts on the fallacy of the"token" argument: the premise is flawed because "token", as used by the half-wit inbreds on this thread, means anybody who isn't a white male.<br />" Token", as used by the dip-shit troglodytes on this thread, also infers " affirmative action". This premise is also flawed as the idea is to characterize any " token" appointee unqualified: meaning that to the stupid hicks on this thread, only white males are patently qualified-- while women, blacks, hispanics ,asians etc. are nominated because of <br />"identity politics". Like Harriet Myers...<br /><br />In any case, the collective blabbering on this thread is like the sweet sound of Conservatism digging its own grave. Fascinating to witness the irrelevance of a whole group of people who simply cannot grasp that this country is no longer stuck in the 20th century.<br />Keep diggin, boys!<br />Someday you might make it to China after all....Young 4-Eyeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04159195318322896154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-24067638373128111942009-05-27T01:46:21.264-04:002009-05-27T01:46:21.264-04:00And over in Arizona, McJerk is up for re-election ...<I>And over in Arizona, McJerk is up for re-election in 2010. Do you just kinda sorta think that the Hispanics of that state might be watching what he and Kyl, the nutcase, are going to do?</I>They ignored McCain's record in 2008.Josephhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04720409839023747889noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-87994690226612941262009-05-27T00:26:48.235-04:002009-05-27T00:26:48.235-04:00So is Sotomayor a wiser Latin women than all the w...So is Sotomayor a wiser Latin women than all the wise Latin women I see in public in LA getting slapped around by their own children?<br /><br />I always wondered where the kids got that. Did I miss the Cantinflas movie where he coldcocked Mamacita, or the Power Rangers ep where the Rangers slapped the crap outta Mom because she wouldn't let the Pink Ranger come out and fight evil?<br /><br />TW: gingwore: a diehard Newt supporterrichard mcenroehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10659450906647134430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-4859508104600010242009-05-26T20:55:43.380-04:002009-05-26T20:55:43.380-04:00"Jim said..."
1) It's not really much of a secret..."Jim said..."<br /><br />1) It's not really much of a secret that Obama is using the "wise Latina woman" and all Latinos as pawns in his electoral power games, but thanks anyway.<br /><br />2) Dream on over your progs will be in power for a generation, since the Greatest Depression Obama and the rest of his DC Clowns are cooking up will be far more important to the electorate than silly identity politics.<br /><br />Now let me let you in on a little secret, Jim. The GOP won't fight this nomination, because:<br /><br />1) We're simply trading one prog justice for another.<br /><br />2) Most elected Republicans are unprincipled, uninspired mopes who only care about their own power too.<br /><br />Prediction: Obama's out in '12, and Americans will also be done rewarding the Depots in DC (on both sides of the aisle) for their epic failures. 2012 is the year of the third party.Raenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-86735588474707533782009-05-26T20:48:58.383-04:002009-05-26T20:48:58.383-04:00"she's only 54 years old, and she's in damn good h..."she's only 54 years old, and she's in damn good health"<br /><br />I'm curious as to how you got a hold of a Federal Judge's medical records...<br /><br />Just the same, we can always follow the liberal example and hope someone "feeds her lots of eggs and butter so she dies early of heart disease."<br /><br />We can, but we won't. This is called "moral superiority." It's harder than relativism, but you should try it sometime... you just might like yourself for a change.Captain Obviousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-75497016953431036512009-05-26T20:39:01.552-04:002009-05-26T20:39:01.552-04:00Just once in my life I’d like to see a president n...<I>Just once in my life I’d like to see a president nominate to the court a graduate of, say, University of Tennessee Law School.</I>As a student at the University of Tennessee College of Law, I wholeheartedly agree with this. ;)<br /><br />There was a Supreme Court Justice who had his Bachelor Degree from UT. I think it was Justice Sanford.J. Molinarohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15387907423681564161noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-21983355623020792142009-05-26T20:37:39.777-04:002009-05-26T20:37:39.777-04:00Go, Rush, Go!!<A HREF="http://thepage.time.com/rush-limbaugh-on-sonia-sotomayor-nomination/" REL="nofollow">Go, Rush, Go</A>!!grinderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09884922107235885961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-10467706041097143952009-05-26T20:24:04.309-04:002009-05-26T20:24:04.309-04:00Of course, she's a token! She's two tokens: a wom...Of course, she's a token! She's two tokens: a woman and whatever Hispatinos call themselves now. And that's because there weren't any female, paraplegic, dyslexic, half-Hispanic, half-Asians on the courts of appeals. You want as many firsts on the table as possible. That's the essence of identity politics: 1. Justices should have empathy for the underclasses and 2. The only way you can be sure they'll be empathetic is to appoint someone from that group. <br /><br />That explains why it took so long for "colored people" to gain any headway in fighting Jim Crow in the courts. The constitutional limits on federal power to strike down state laws had nothing to do with it. It was all lack of empathy! <br /><br />I always regretted not taking Con Law in law school, not no more than now, when I learn that it was all this simple. It would have been an easy 'A.'ASThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14591247136037620408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-7059303812523831182009-05-26T20:20:59.211-04:002009-05-26T20:20:59.211-04:00Hey wingers, there's going to be a special electio...Hey wingers, there's going to be a special election in TX when Hutchinson runs for governor. That ought to be interesting after your side makes clear that it couldn't give a shit about the Hispanics. First it was the border wall, now Sotamayor. Good luck with that!<br /><br />And over in Arizona, McJerk is up for re-election in 2010. Do you just kinda sorta think that the Hispanics of that state might be watching what he and Kyl, the nutcase, are going to do?<br /><br />Nah, not at all. Carry on, wackos! By the way, the very best outcome from my point of view is a nasty, ugly battle in which Sotamayor fails to be confirmed because of a Republican filibuster. That would tip TX and AZ, and once tipped they ain't gonna tip back for a long while.grinderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09884922107235885961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-47858333500951178212009-05-26T20:02:57.400-04:002009-05-26T20:02:57.400-04:00Anyone check her taxes yet? She seems rather arro...Anyone check her taxes yet? She seems rather arrogant to me, tax cheats and arrogance go hand in hand.Clifton Bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00273941007555823028noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-78892897008930566602009-05-26T19:41:19.487-04:002009-05-26T19:41:19.487-04:00I guess Jim lets us know why the liberal assholes ...I guess Jim lets us know why the liberal assholes seem to push two language systems, illegal immigration, race based political systems.<br /><br />It's not like we didn't know what you assholes were up to Jim, but thanks for letting us know what your motivations are.<br /><br />yeah, what about that, "single party rule is horrible" bullshit?<br /><br />As usual, the liberals have no rules, no morals, and have no problem with lying.<br /><br />And molesting boys as well.<br /><br />What marvelous people.E Buzzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04363646592893172933noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-14236300877800413912009-05-26T18:23:49.001-04:002009-05-26T18:23:49.001-04:00You MUST oppose her tooth and claw.Why? Even if we...<I>You MUST oppose her tooth and claw.</I>Why? Even if we reactionaries were successful, he'd just nominate someone further left.<br /><br />I've recommended having spare nominees handy <A HREF="http://hertzlinger.blogspot.com/2005/07/suggestion-for-supreme-court.html" REL="nofollow">a few years ago</A> and the tactic is obvious enough for Obama to have a few spares as well.Josephhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04720409839023747889noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-38682005729505215802009-05-26T17:58:42.456-04:002009-05-26T17:58:42.456-04:00Wow, I guess "Jim" said it all. Its a war, pure an...Wow, I guess "Jim" said it all. Its a war, pure and simple.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-38122821615539884382009-05-26T16:34:09.088-04:002009-05-26T16:34:09.088-04:00Hey wingers, I'm going to let you in on a secret. ...Hey wingers, I'm going to let you in on a secret. It's all about identity politics. Not only that, but she's more liberal than she appears. Not only that, but she's only 54 years old, and she's in damn good health.<br /><br />You MUST oppose her tooth and claw. Which means that the Republicans in the Senate must do the same, or they face primary challenges. Which means your 44% Hispanic support in '04 that dropped to 31% in '08 is going to drop to 20% in '12.<br /><br />Which means that Texas and Arizona are in play. Which means you're screwed for a generation. Which means that we liberals aren't as opposed to torture as we claim. You are chained to a rock, a large bird devouring your liver, and we are laughing.<br /><br />So unfair. So horribly, horribly unfair.grinderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09884922107235885961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-88999753228148256542009-05-26T15:20:53.063-04:002009-05-26T15:20:53.063-04:00The "South Bronx" reference reminds me of George C...The "South Bronx" reference reminds me of George Carlin's schtick about saying he grew up in "White Harlem," which sounded way cooler than "Morningside Heights."Bill Peschelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15257587479467531187noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-12848813776316093472009-05-26T15:19:23.388-04:002009-05-26T15:19:23.388-04:00RE:How can you guys not love her? She was first no...RE:How can you guys not love her? She was first nominated to the Fed bench by Pres G. Bush?!@?!#%<br /><br />From judicialnetwork.com, emphasis mine.<br />"The White House is sure to argue that Sotomayor is a “bipartisan pick” because Bush 41 appointed her to the district court: President George H.W. Bush nominated Sotomayor in 1991 only because the New York senators had forced on the White House a <B>deal that enabled Senator Moynihan to name one of every four district court nominees</B> in New York. In 1998, 29 Republican senators voted against President Clinton’s nomination of Sotomayor to the Second Circuit.Captain Obviousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-46543257298547089132009-05-26T15:05:31.487-04:002009-05-26T15:05:31.487-04:00The Barney Frank defense:
Bush did it, too.
http...The Barney Frank defense:<br /><br />Bush did it, too.<br /><br />http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Why-did-George-HW-Bush-pick-Sotomayor-for-the-courts-46094732.html<br /><br />Unfortunately, it's too true.Croaker Norgehttp://croakernorge.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-86973087241987522802009-05-26T15:02:09.400-04:002009-05-26T15:02:09.400-04:00Isn't it odd that (a) on the one hand, her being a...<I>Isn't it odd that (a) on the one hand, her being a Latina inspires MSM celebration, yet (b) on the other hand, nobody is supposed to think she was chosen mainly because she is a Latina?<br /></I>Reminds me of the scene from Deuce Bigalow, European Gigolo:<br /><br />Deuce Bigalow: T.J., I'm so glad you are here.<br />T.J. Hicks: How did you find me?<br />Deuce Bigalow: Well, this seemed like the only chicken and waffles place in all of Holland.<br />T.J. Hicks: Ohhh, so the black guy has to go to a chicken and waffles place, that's Racist!<br />Deuce Bigalow: But you're here.<br />T.J. Hicks: Yeah, but figuring it out was racist.spunkyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18044701113416882804noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4223398383609158624.post-21607737973950572792009-05-26T14:54:59.109-04:002009-05-26T14:54:59.109-04:00I could have sworn Alito was of hispanic descent.I could have sworn Alito was of hispanic descent.Benhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03809649225884174558noreply@blogger.com